Tecpro System Limited vs Ultratech Cements Limited — IA/1690/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020104262026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/10426/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

IA/1690/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11
Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tecpro System Limited

    Adv. Abhiishek Bhaduri

  2. 2.Ramachandra Subramanian

    Adv. BHADURI ABHISHEK SUSHANT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ultratech Cements Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Interim Application No. 1690 of 2026 filed by Tecpro System Limited against Ultratech Cements Limited as withdrawn. The applicant's counsel conceded that the interim application was not filed in the proper format and sought permission to withdraw it and refile, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed Interim Application No. 1690 of 2026 filed by Tecpro System Limited against Ultratech Cements Limited as withdrawn. The applicant's counsel conceded that the interim application was not filed in the proper format and sought permission to withdraw it and refile, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case