ARVIND PRAVINKUMAR MEHTA vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY — WP/1937/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020104082026
Filing Number
WP/10408/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/1937/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARVIND PRAVINKUMAR MEHTA
Adv. ASHWIN S TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OFFICE OF REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
3.SIGMA HAPPY HOMES LLP
-
4.JAI HANUMAN SRA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
-
5.APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of three consolidated writ petitions filed by Arvind Pravinkumar Mehta, Pravinkumar Genmal Mehta, and Rajkumar Pravinkumar Mehta against the Slum Rehabilitation Authority with the order "Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board," indicating the petitioners were improperly placed on a board and should be removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1937/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of three consolidated writ petitions filed by Arvind Pravinkumar Mehta, Pravinkumar Genmal Mehta, and Rajkumar Pravinkumar Mehta against the Slum Rehabilitation Authority with the order "Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board," indicating the petitioners were improperly placed on a board and should be removed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts