RAJIV INDERJIT DHAWAN AND SANJEEV INDERJIT DHAWAN ARE PETITIONERS vs Inderjit Santram Dhawan DECEASED — TP/2216/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
CNR: HCBM020103822026
e-Filing Number
21-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/10382/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
TP/2216/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Coram
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJIV INDERJIT DHAWAN AND SANJEEV INDERJIT DHAWAN ARE PETITIONERS
Adv. Vishal Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inderjit Santram Dhawan DECEASED
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Aug-2026
For Direction
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
05-May-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
Case Summary: TP/2216/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 06.08.2026. The court directed petitioners Rajiv Inderjit Dhawan and Sanjeev Inderjit Dhawan to comply with testamentary procedure requirements, including issuing citations within two weeks, submitting Schedule-I copies, notifying the Collector and non-consenting legal heirs, and furnishing an administration bond. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2216/2026
Case Summary: TP/2216/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 06.08.2026. The court directed petitioners Rajiv Inderjit Dhawan and Sanjeev Inderjit Dhawan to comply with testamentary procedure requirements, including issuing citations within two weeks, submitting Schedule-I copies, notifying the Collector and non-consenting legal heirs, and furnishing an administration bond. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts