HDFC BANK LIMITED MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR vs KALYAN K BHUNIA — EXA/2025/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020103812023

Filing Number

EXA/10377/2023

Filing Date

12-Apr-2023

Registration No

EXA/2025/2023

Registration Date

26-Dec-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KALYAN K BHUNIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications across 268 cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International, the court held unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio, set aside all arbitral awards, and dismissed execution applications. Parties may initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 12-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2025/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications across 268 cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International, the court held unilateral arbitrator appointments void ab initio, set aside all arbitral awards, and dismissed execution applications. Parties may initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case