AXIS BANK LTD vs AZAD KAMIN ALI SIDDIQUI — EXA/2395/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020103522022

Filing Number

EXA/10350/2022

Filing Date

30-Mar-2022

Registration No

EXA/2395/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK LTD

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AZAD KAMIN ALI SIDDIQUI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2395/2025 (Axis Bank Ltd v. Azad Kamin Ali Siddiqui) The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. All execution applications and connected interim applications were accordingly dismissed, but parties retain the right to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from the statute of limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 24-Nov-2022

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla

  6. 13-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2395/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2395/2025 (Axis Bank Ltd v. Azad Kamin Ali Siddiqui) The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. All execution applications and connected interim applications were accordingly dismissed, but parties retain the right to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded from the statute of limitations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case