Firdous Elias Khatri vs Haji Elias Abdulla Khatri — MPT/447/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Next hearing 07-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020103192026

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

MPT/10319/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

MPT/447/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Firdous Elias Khatri

    Adv. Darshi Jhaveri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Haji Elias Abdulla Khatri

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the miscellaneous petition filed by Firdous Elias Khatri seeking issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Haji Elias Abdulla Khatri. The court certified that 13 named individuals are the sole legal heirs and representatives of the deceased, and directed the department to issue the legal heirship certificate within 3 weeks from the date of removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MPT/447/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the miscellaneous petition filed by Firdous Elias Khatri seeking issuance of a legal heirship certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 for the deceased Haji Elias Abdulla Khatri. The court certified that 13 named individuals are the sole legal heirs and representatives of the deceased, and directed the department to issue the legal heirship certificate within 3 weeks from the date of removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case