AXIS BANK (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD) vs MISHRA VIKAS RAJKUMAR — EXA/2393/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020103102022

Filing Number

EXA/10308/2022

Filing Date

30-Mar-2022

Registration No

EXA/2393/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD)

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MISHRA VIKAS RAJKUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including Axis Bank vs. Mishra Vikas Rajkumar) finding that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the awards void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration, with the period spent in the voided proceedings excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 16-Oct-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 24-Nov-2022

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla

  6. 13-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2393/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including Axis Bank vs. Mishra Vikas Rajkumar) finding that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the awards void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration, with the period spent in the voided proceedings excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case