MAHESH SHAM SHETTY, LEGAL HAIR OF NALINI SHETTY vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER — HCBM20101662026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Next hearing 27-Mar-2026

CNR: HCBM020101662026

Filing Number

WP/10166/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHESH SHAM SHETTY, LEGAL HAIR OF NALINI SHETTY

    Adv. K Amol

  2. 2.MANISHA PRAVEEN SHETTY, LEGAL HEIR OF NALINI SHETTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER

  2. 2.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, K/WEST

  4. 4.MAHARASHRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Summary The writ petition was disposed of. The court allowed the petitioners' residential structure (No. 40) to remain standing for four weeks, subject to their undertaking to voluntarily vacate and hand over possession to the Municipal Corporation. The petitioners were declared eligible for five structures (four commercial, one residential) and permitted to file an appeal within two weeks challenging ineligibility of remaining structures, to be decided within seven days. The court also directed restoration of electricity and water connections and offered PAP tenement options if petitioners approach authorities within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  11. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The writ petition was disposed of. The court allowed the petitioners' residential structure (No. 40) to remain standing for four weeks, subject to their undertaking to voluntarily vacate and hand over possession to the Municipal Corporation. The petitioners were declared eligible for five structures (four commercial, one residential) and permitted to file an appeal within two weeks challenging ineligibility of remaining structures, to be decided within seven days. The court also directed restoration of electricity and water connections and offered PAP tenement options if petitioners approach authorities within seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case