PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 MUMBAI vs BAJAJ HOLDINGS AND INVESTMENT LTD AY 1998 99 ITA 8952 MUM 2004 — HCBM20101462025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020101462025

e-Filing Number

28-03-2025

Filing Number

ITXA/10146/2025

Filing Date

28-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 MUMBAI

    Adv. ARJUN GUPTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ HOLDINGS AND INVESTMENT LTD AY 1998 99 ITA 8952 MUM 2004

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    This order is NOT related to the case cited in your prompt (Bajaj Holdings case from AY 1998-99). The document before me concerns multiple Income Tax appeals (ITXAL cases from 2025) heard on June 9, 2026. The Bombay High Court gave appellants a final two-week deadline to cure office objections and get their appeals registered; failure results in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. Similarly, two interim applications (IAL 29150/2025 and 36865/2025) must have objections removed within two weeks or face rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 28-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This order is NOT related to the case cited in your prompt (Bajaj Holdings case from AY 1998-99). The document before me concerns multiple Income Tax appeals (ITXAL cases from 2025) heard on June 9, 2026. The Bombay High Court gave appellants a final two-week deadline to cure office objections and get their appeals registered; failure results in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. Similarly, two interim applications (IAL 29150/2025 and 36865/2025) must have objections removed within two weeks or face rejection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case