L AND T FINANCE LTD. vs SIVA EARTH MOVERS AND RENUKADEVI S. — EXA/1651/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020101452015

Filing Number

EXA/808/2015

Filing Date

08-Apr-2015

Registration No

EXA/1651/2015

Registration Date

05-Aug-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. S. I. Joshi and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIVA EARTH MOVERS AND RENUKADEVI S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/1651/2015 - L & T Finance Ltd. v. Siva Earth Movers The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this execution application because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which renders the appointment void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution application and granted parties liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior period of arbitration from any limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 08-Apr-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1651/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/1651/2015 - L & T Finance Ltd. v. Siva Earth Movers The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this execution application because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which renders the appointment void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed the execution application and granted parties liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior period of arbitration from any limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case