SYNERGY LOG-IN SYSTEMS LTD vs THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-34, MUMBAI — CHOL/240/2026
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 1. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020100972026
Filing Number
CHOL/10095/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
CHOL/240/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Coram
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
Bench Type
Single
Category
CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )
Sub-Category
Discharge of Advocate ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SYNERGY LOG-IN SYSTEMS LTD
Adv. Atul K Jasani
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-34, MUMBAI
Case History
-
24-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
Case Summary: CHOL/240/2026 Outcome: The Chamber Order was allowed and disposed of. Advocate Atul K. Jasani was discharged as counsel for Synergy Log-In Systems Ltd. (now Secure Earth Technologies Ltd.) in Income Tax Appeal No. 621 of 2009, as the original appellant company no longer exists and the advocate could not maintain contact with or receive instructions from the appellant despite multiple service attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master
-
17-Apr-2026
Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CHOL/240/2026
Case Summary: CHOL/240/2026 Outcome: The Chamber Order was allowed and disposed of. Advocate Atul K. Jasani was discharged as counsel for Synergy Log-In Systems Ltd. (now Secure Earth Technologies Ltd.) in Income Tax Appeal No. 621 of 2009, as the original appellant company no longer exists and the advocate could not maintain contact with or receive instructions from the appellant despite multiple service attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts