ESSAR WORLD TRADE LTD. MUMBAI vs THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5 MUMBAI — CHOL/241/2026

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020100772026

Filing Number

CHOL/10075/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CHOL/241/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Coram

Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Discharge of Advocate ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ESSAR WORLD TRADE LTD. MUMBAI

    Adv. Atul K Jasani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -5 MUMBAI

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior MasterView PDF

    Summary of CHOL/241/2026 The Chamber Order filed by Advocate Atul K. Jasani seeking discharge from Income Tax Appeal No. 602 of 2009 was allowed and disposed of. The advocate was discharged as counsel for the respondent (now Essar Infrastructure Services Pvt. Ltd.) due to inability to contact the client and the original company's non-existence following merger/NCLT proceedings. The court directed removal of the advocate's name from the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Pooja Bhaidkar Addl.Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CHOL/241/2026 The Chamber Order filed by Advocate Atul K. Jasani seeking discharge from Income Tax Appeal No. 602 of 2009 was allowed and disposed of. The advocate was discharged as counsel for the respondent (now Essar Infrastructure Services Pvt. Ltd.) due to inability to contact the client and the original company's non-existence following merger/NCLT proceedings. The court directed removal of the advocate's name from the record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case