GODREJ and BOYCE MFG.CO.LTDand ANR. vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY — CHOL/249/2026

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020099992026

Filing Number

CHOL/9997/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

CHOL/249/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Coram

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Substituted Service ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GODREJ and BOYCE MFG.CO.LTDand ANR.

    Adv. B MUNIM

  2. 2.S P GODREJ CHARIMAN AND DIRECTOR OF GODREJ AND BOYCE MFG CO LTD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY

  2. 2.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE WARD OFFICER, N/WARD,

  4. 4.SHAHID AHMAD

  5. 5.TOHIRABI MOHD

  6. 6.RAJBAI AHMED

  7. 7.RIYAZ KHAN

  8. 8.ISMAIL BHAI

  9. 9.KRISHNBABAI SHINDE

  10. 10.M ABDUL GAFFAR

  11. 11.ASHREF A

  12. 12.RAM BAPU

  13. 13.LATIF HASAN

  14. 14.BILKIS BEGUM

  15. 15.AFROZ KHAN

  16. 16.MOHD YUSUF

  17. 17.MUSTAFA NOOR MOHD

  18. 18.JAFAR ANSARI

  19. 19.ASHABAI KHALI SAYYED

  20. 20.JAMUL OEMAR

  21. 21.RAFIX AHMAD

  22. 22.ZANUR AHMAD

  23. 23.SOGRABI

  24. 24.ABDUL KADAR

  25. 25.RASHID AHMAD

  26. 26.KARIMABI

  27. 27.MASTAN SAHEB

  28. 28.SHEBIR AHMAD NOOR MOHD

  29. 29.RAIS AHMAD

  30. 30.LEELAVATI HEGDE

  31. 31.USMAN

  32. 32.SURESH DAHYABHAI PATEL

  33. 33.ABDUL SALAM SHAIKH

  34. 34.DURGALAL RAMPAL

  35. 35.RAHANA BEGUM ANSARI

  36. 36.SHEIKH ADAM

  37. 37.MUNNI BEGAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)View PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Additional Registrar) allowed the petitioners' chamber order to serve notice on Respondent No. 4 (Shri Shahid Ahmad) through substituted service via newspaper publication, as direct service had failed (notice returned as "unclaimed"). The court directed publication in two newspapers—"Free Press Journal" (English) and "Navshakti" (Marathi)—within two weeks, with the registry to issue a fresh notice with the court's returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Additional Registrar) allowed the petitioners' chamber order to serve notice on Respondent No. 4 (Shri Shahid Ahmad) through substituted service via newspaper publication, as direct service had failed (notice returned as "unclaimed"). The court directed publication in two newspapers—"Free Press Journal" (English) and "Navshakti" (Marathi)—within two weeks, with the registry to issue a fresh notice with the court's returnable date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case