Khandu Vishnu Phapale vs Vishnu Bhau Phapale alias Vishnu B Phapale alias V B Phapale — MPT/410/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act Viii of 1827 Section 2. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020099652026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
MPT/9963/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
MPT/410/2026
Registration Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Khandu Vishnu Phapale
Adv. MOHAN GAWADE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vishnu Bhau Phapale alias Vishnu B Phapale alias V B Phapale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
The High Court of Bombay allowed petitioner Khandu Vishnu Phapale's petition for a Legal Heirship Certificate naming all three legal heirs (Khandu, Bhausaheb, and Hari) of the deceased Vishnu Bhau Phapale. However, the court clarified that issuance of the grant does not determine title to the disputed immovable property or automatically transfer it to any heir; parties must resolve substantive ownership disputes through civil court proceedings. The grant was to be issued within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Misc. Petition For Admission / Final Hearing [Under Bombay Regulation Act ,Viii]
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/410/2026
The High Court of Bombay allowed petitioner Khandu Vishnu Phapale's petition for a Legal Heirship Certificate naming all three legal heirs (Khandu, Bhausaheb, and Hari) of the deceased Vishnu Bhau Phapale. However, the court clarified that issuance of the grant does not determine title to the disputed immovable property or automatically transfer it to any heir; parties must resolve substantive ownership disputes through civil court proceedings. The grant was to be issued within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts