GANESH NAGAR BACHO SANGHARSH SAMITI vs THE SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY — HCBM20099632026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020099632026
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/9961/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GANESH NAGAR BACHO SANGHARSH SAMITI
Adv. Jayesh Mestry
PANDURANG MALJI MHASKAR
CHANDRAKANT S PAWAR
GANESH KISAN KHOT
LATABAI SHANKAR KADU
SHOBHA VASANT BARE
PARVATI VISHNU KAEES
DEEPAK PANDURANG KHOT
VASANT KAMLYA BANDUKE
VALLABHBHAI K BHOJIYA
Respondent(s)
THE SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
LAKDAWALA HOUSING PVT LTD
PRARTHANA GRIHA NIRMAN
SHREE GANESH SEVA CHS(PROP)
Adv. Purva Naik
APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE SECRETARY
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Adv. GP OS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 01-07-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court Division Bench (Justices M.S. Karnik and S.M. Modak) transferred the matter to the learned Single Judge. The Court held that since the petitioner's main relief sought is under prayer clause (a), the case pertains to Single Judge jurisdiction rather than Division Bench jurisdiction, and granted liberty to the petitioner to move before the Single Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court Division Bench (Justices M.S. Karnik and S.M. Modak) transferred the matter to the learned Single Judge. The Court held that since the petitioner's main relief sought is under prayer clause (a), the case pertains to Single Judge jurisdiction rather than Division Bench jurisdiction, and granted liberty to the petitioner to move before the Single Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts