PANKAJ K PHADNIS (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT) vs NIRAJ GUNDE — HCBM20099222026

Case under Public Interest Litigation Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020099222026

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

TPAC/9920/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Judge

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Coram

E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Public Interest Litigation Section 1

Petitioner(s)

PANKAJ K PHADNIS (THIRD PARTY APPLICANT)

Respondent(s)

NIRAJ GUNDE

Hearing History

Judge: E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

25-03-2026

FOR DIRECTION

17-04-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

17-04-2026
E.B. Sivakumar(Addl. Registrar(OS)/Addl. Protho. and Senior Master)

Case Summary: Dr. Pankaj K. Phadnis filed a Third Party Application seeking a certified copy of records from PIL No. 69 of 2008 for use in his newly filed PIL No. 14792 of 2025. The court directed that he submit a written application to the Prothonotary & Senior Master to produce the required records at the time of hearing his PIL. The Third Party Application was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application for the certified copy upon showing sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dr. Pankaj K. Phadnis filed a Third Party Application seeking a certified copy of records from PIL No. 69 of 2008 for use in his newly filed PIL No. 14792 of 2025. The court directed that he submit a written application to the Prothonotary & Senior Master to produce the required records at the time of hearing his PIL. The Third Party Application was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application for the certified copy upon showing sufficient cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case