OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF MANTRI REALTY LIMITED. (IN LIQUIDATION) vs MAHARASHTRA SAVINGS (PETITIONER) — OLR/147/2026

Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 148(2),454. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020098642026

Filing Number

OLR/9863/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

OLR/147/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 148(2),454

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF MANTRI REALTY LIMITED. (IN LIQUIDATION)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA SAVINGS (PETITIONER)

  2. 2.NA

  3. 3.NA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted the Official Liquidator's report in full, authorizing: (a) publication of notices inviting creditor claims in specified newspapers across Mumbai, Bangalore, Gwalior, and Solapur through a panel advertising agency; (b) dispensing with formal notice requirements to creditors despite absence of a complete Statement of Affairs; and (c) appointment of panel chartered accountants to adjudicate creditor claims, with all professional fees payable from company liquidation funds. The court found these directions were natural procedural consequences of the winding-up order dated August 8, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. OLR/147/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted the Official Liquidator's report in full, authorizing: (a) publication of notices inviting creditor claims in specified newspapers across Mumbai, Bangalore, Gwalior, and Solapur through a panel advertising agency; (b) dispensing with formal notice requirements to creditors despite absence of a complete Statement of Affairs; and (c) appointment of panel chartered accountants to adjudicate creditor claims, with all professional fees payable from company liquidation funds. The court found these directions were natural procedural consequences of the winding-up order dated August 8, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case