Harsheen Kaur Chadha vs Baldev singh chadha alias chadha baldev singh — TP/2379/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020098522026
e-Filing Number
17-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/9851/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
TP/2379/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Harsheen Kaur Chadha
Adv. SAGAR R JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.Baldev singh chadha alias chadha baldev singh
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/2379/2026 Case Called for Direction (6th May 2026): The testamentary petition filed by Harsheen Kaur Chadha against Baldev Singh Chadha was adjourned for compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs via Sheriff Mumbai, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules, and check for cross petitions. The matter may be relisted after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2379/2026
Case Summary: TP/2379/2026 Case Called for Direction (6th May 2026): The testamentary petition filed by Harsheen Kaur Chadha against Baldev Singh Chadha was adjourned for compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs via Sheriff Mumbai, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules, and check for cross petitions. The matter may be relisted after all compliance requirements are satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts