Divya Devendra Joshi vs Savitri Jairam/ Savitriben Joshi — TP/2509/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020098512026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/9850/2026
Filing Date
18-03-2026
Registration No
TP/2509/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Divya Devendra Joshi
Adv. Rekha R. Jain
Respondent(s)
Savitri Jairam/ Savitriben Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: TP/2509/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Divya Devendra Joshi was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court (Bombay High Court) directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs as per Rules 399-400, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for re-listing after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: TP/2509/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Divya Devendra Joshi was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court (Bombay High Court) directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs as per Rules 399-400, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for re-listing after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts