Divya Devendra Joshi vs Savitri Jairam/ Savitriben Joshi — TP/2509/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020098512026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/9850/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

TP/2509/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Divya Devendra Joshi

Adv. Rekha R. Jain

Respondent(s)

Savitri Jairam/ Savitriben Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

08-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

08-06-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case Summary: TP/2509/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Divya Devendra Joshi was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court (Bombay High Court) directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs as per Rules 399-400, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for re-listing after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2509/2026 The testamentary petition filed by Divya Devendra Joshi was called for direction on 8th June 2026. The court (Bombay High Court) directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate was directed to file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs as per Rules 399-400, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond per Rule 421. The court also directed verification of any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for re-listing after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case