MAFATLAL H. SHAH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — CHOL/230/2026

Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020097962026

Filing Number

CHOL/9795/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

CHOL/230/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAFATLAL H. SHAH

    Adv. Pratik K Shah

  2. 2.AMIT M SHAH

  3. 3.SEEMA A. SHAH

  4. 4.INDU H. SHAH

  5. 5.SEEMA L. JAIN

  6. 6.KANTILAL A. SHAH (HUF), THROUGH ITS KARTA KANTILAL ACHALAJI SHAH

  7. 7.LILAVATI K. SHAH

  8. 8.MANJULABEN M. SHAH

  9. 9.MAFATLAL H. SHAH (HUF), THORUGH ITS KARTA MAFATLAL H. SHAH

  10. 10.KANTILAL A. SHAH

  11. 11.BRINDA J. SHAH

  12. 12.TARUN V. SHAH

  13. 13.INDU M. SHAH

  14. 14.HOMAI BEHRAM NAMDARIAN (IRANI)

  15. 15.PRIYANK M. SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

  3. 3.MUMBAI BUILDING REPAIR AND RECONSTRUCTION BOARD THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  4. 4.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA), THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER MUMBAI

  5. 5.SAFEWAY PROJECTS PVT LTD

  6. 6.SAJID MALIK CHINOY

  7. 7.SAAHIR SAJID CHINOY

  8. 8.MOHAMMAD ZAID BADHUJAR

  9. 9.MAHARASHTRA STATE WAKF BOARD

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Jun-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1709 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case filed by Mafatlal H. Shah against the State of Maharashtra (Urban Development Department) was adjourned. The court, citing paucity of time, stood over the balance daily board hearing to 23 June 2026. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues to operate until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1709 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case filed by Mafatlal H. Shah against the State of Maharashtra (Urban Development Department) was adjourned. The court, citing paucity of time, stood over the balance daily board hearing to 23 June 2026. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues to operate until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case