KRIPA ONENESS PVT. LTD. vs PRADEEP KISHAN HIRANI — HCBM20097132026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020097132026

Filing Number

IA/9713/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRIPA ONENESS PVT. LTD.

    Adv. Glenn Mendonca,Glenn Mendonca,Glenn Mendonca, ,Glenn Mendonca

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP KISHAN HIRANI

  2. 2.SANJAY KISHAN HIRANI

  3. 3.COURT RECEIVER (PROPOSED RESPONDENT)

  4. 4.PUSHPA KISHAN HIRANI (ORG. PLAINTIFF NO.

  5. 5.ANIL KISHAN HIRANI (ORG. PLAINTIFF NO.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

    The Bombay High Court's order on Interim Application 9713 of 2026 in Suit 482 of 2023 (Kripa Oneness Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kishan Hirani) contains only a procedural notation: "Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board." This appears to be an administrative direction regarding case listing rather than a substantive judgment on the merits of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court's order on Interim Application 9713 of 2026 in Suit 482 of 2023 (Kripa Oneness Pvt. Ltd. v. Pradeep Kishan Hirani) contains only a procedural notation: "Wrongly on board. Remove from the Board." This appears to be an administrative direction regarding case listing rather than a substantive judgment on the merits of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case