Ravisen Manmohan Mehra LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY vs Manmohan Ranbirsen Mehra alias Manmohan Mehra — TP/1741/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020096902026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/9690/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/1741/2026

Registration Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ravisen Manmohan Mehra LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manmohan Ranbirsen Mehra alias Manmohan Mehra

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Status Summary: The testamentary petition (40 TP/1741/2026) was called for direction on 15th April 2026. The court directed the advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and check for any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with these procedural requirements, with liberty to relist after all formalities are completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1741/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: The testamentary petition (40 TP/1741/2026) was called for direction on 15th April 2026. The court directed the advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and check for any cross petitions. The matter was adjourned pending compliance with these procedural requirements, with liberty to relist after all formalities are completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case