CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD. MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR vs MOHD MUSTAQUE SHAIKH — EXA/1297/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020096442024

Filing Number

EXA/9640/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

EXA/1297/2024

Registration Date

05-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE CO. LTD. MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD MUSTAQUE SHAIKH

  2. 2.KULSUMBANO MOHD SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary of EXA/1297/2024 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. All execution applications and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period already spent in the previous arbitration from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1297/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of EXA/1297/2024 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters (Serial Nos. 901-903, 905-1150) after finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, following the Supreme Court's ruling in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. All execution applications and interim applications were dismissed, with parties permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the time period already spent in the previous arbitration from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case