NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD Parinam Law Associates vs JOHN DOE S ASHOK KUMAR S — HCBM20095642026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 20. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020095642026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/9564/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD Parinam Law Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JOHN DOE S ASHOK KUMAR S

  2. 2.X Corp

  3. 3.GOOGLE LLC

  4. 4.ADMINISTRATORS OF WEBSITE BEING

  5. 5.NAMECHEAP INC

  6. 6.GODADDY LLC

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. against trademark infringement and passing off. The court ordered social media intermediaries (Twitter/X and YouTube) to remove/disable infringing accounts and channels using the "NSE" trademark within 36 hours, and directed domain registrars to suspend infringing websites within the same timeframe, while providing safeguards allowing intermediaries to challenge removal requests they deem non-infringing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. against trademark infringement and passing off. The court ordered social media intermediaries (Twitter/X and YouTube) to remove/disable infringing accounts and channels using the "NSE" trademark within 36 hours, and directed domain registrars to suspend infringing websites within the same timeframe, while providing safeguards allowing intermediaries to challenge removal requests they deem non-infringing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case