ASHOKKUMAR H GAJERA vs UNION OF INDIA — WP/1639/2026

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 250. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020095502026

e-Filing Number

13-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/9550/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/1639/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 250

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKKUMAR H GAJERA

    Adv. Rajendra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.CHAIRMAN CBDT

  3. 3.PRINCIPLE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS

  5. 5.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 19 3

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1639 of 2026 filed by Ashokkumar H. Gajeria against the Union of India and CBDT officials as withdrawn. After being afforded a hearing opportunity, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Withdrawal

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1639/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 1639 of 2026 filed by Ashokkumar H. Gajeria against the Union of India and CBDT officials as withdrawn. After being afforded a hearing opportunity, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case