Tata Capital Limited Through its Authorized Signatory Mr Omkar Kadam vs Som Raj HUF — CARBP/515/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020095132026

e-Filing Number

15-03-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/9513/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

CARBP/515/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tata Capital Limited Through its Authorized Signatory Mr Omkar Kadam

    Adv. Goenka Law Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Som Raj HUF

  2. 2.Som Raj

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 9

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay granted Tata Capital Limited's request to withdraw its Commercial Arbitration Petition against Som Raj HUF after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that both parties were attempting to resolve their dispute amicably. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition if needed in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARBP/515/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay granted Tata Capital Limited's request to withdraw its Commercial Arbitration Petition against Som Raj HUF after the petitioner's counsel informed the court that both parties were attempting to resolve their dispute amicably. The petition was disposed of with liberty to file a fresh petition if needed in the future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case