HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHI — EXA/2528/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020094542023

Filing Number

EXA/9450/2023

Filing Date

03-Apr-2023

Registration No

EXA/2528/2024

Registration Date

06-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with limitation periods excluded from the prior invocation, unless there was express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 03-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2528/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards, holding that unilateral appointment of sole arbitrators is void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with limitation periods excluded from the prior invocation, unless there was express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case