Deepak Kumar Jagdish Prasad Sharma vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai 5 and Ors — HCBM20094402025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 33. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020094402025

e-Filing Number

23-03-2025

Filing Number

WP/9441/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 33
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Kumar Jagdish Prasad Sharma

    Adv. VIVEK TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai 5 and Ors

  2. 2.Union of India Through Ministry of Finance

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The High Court of Bombay rejected multiple petitions (102-165 WPL/2025) filed by various petitioners against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Union of India for non-compliance with office objections. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes, with failure to comply resulting in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay rejected multiple petitions (102-165 WPL/2025) filed by various petitioners against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Union of India for non-compliance with office objections. The court gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes, with failure to comply resulting in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case