HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs RAJ KUMAR VIDYARTHI — EXA/1477/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020094042023

Filing Number

EXA/9400/2023

Filing Date

03-Apr-2023

Registration No

EXA/1477/2023

Registration Date

30-Sep-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR VIDYARTHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including in EXA/1477/2023 involving HDB Financial Services and Raj Kumar Vidyarthi) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, rendering them void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 03-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1477/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (including in EXA/1477/2023 involving HDB Financial Services and Raj Kumar Vidyarthi) because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, rendering them void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The Court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case