Sitalakshmi Venkataraman vs Subramaniyam V L — TP/2235/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020093932026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/9392/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2235/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sitalakshmi Venkataraman

    Adv. Sharda Pandey

  2. 2.Janaki Jayaraman w/o Jayaraman Sahasranam Subramanian

    Adv. PANDEY SHARDA RAVI PRATAP

  3. 3.Mahalakshmi Venkataraman W/o Venkataraman

    Adv. PANDEY SHARDA RAVI PRATAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subramaniyam V L

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2235/2026 The testamentary petition was adjourned to 10.08.2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation within two weeks, submit required documents per Rule 396 (including Schedule-I), serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs per Rules 399-400, and furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 if other legal heirs exist. The office was also directed to verify any cross-petitions filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2235/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2235/2026 The testamentary petition was adjourned to 10.08.2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citation within two weeks, submit required documents per Rule 396 (including Schedule-I), serve citations on non-consenting legal heirs per Rules 399-400, and furnish an administration bond for the gross amount per Rule 420 if other legal heirs exist. The office was also directed to verify any cross-petitions filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case