HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD vs MOHD SHABAN UMER MOHD — EXA/3075/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020093822023

Filing Number

EXA/9378/2023

Filing Date

03-Apr-2023

Registration No

EXA/3075/2024

Registration Date

08-Nov-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD SHABAN UMER MOHD

  2. 2.AMINA KHATUN SAJID ALI BARBAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 serial numbered applications and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International case that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the period spent in the previous arbitration excluded from limitation calculations, and allowed relief only if parties had executed a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 03-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/3075/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 serial numbered applications and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International case that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the period spent in the previous arbitration excluded from limitation calculations, and allowed relief only if parties had executed a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case