Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. vs Dolly Khurshed Katrak (Deceased) — TP/2512/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020092162026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/9216/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2512/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dolly Khurshed Katrak (Deceased)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2512/2026 The Testamentary Registrar, Bombay High Court, on 8th June 2026, called the petition filed by Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector. The advocate was directed to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for relisting after compliance and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2512/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2512/2026 The Testamentary Registrar, Bombay High Court, on 8th June 2026, called the petition filed by Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector. The advocate was directed to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for relisting after compliance and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case