Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. vs Dolly Khurshed Katrak (Deceased) — TP/2512/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020092162026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/9216/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
TP/2512/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO.
Respondent(s)
Dolly Khurshed Katrak (Deceased)
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case Summary: TP/2512/2026 The Testamentary Registrar, Bombay High Court, on 8th June 2026, called the petition filed by Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector. The advocate was directed to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for relisting after compliance and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: TP/2512/2026 The Testamentary Registrar, Bombay High Court, on 8th June 2026, called the petition filed by Beheroze Yezdi Cooper PIRANI AND CO. for directions. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and directed the office to issue citation and notice to the Collector. The advocate was directed to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for relisting after compliance and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts