TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCE SERVICE LTD) vs PRINCE TRANS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED RAJESH BAL SINGH AND ANR — EXA/1524/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020091862025

Filing Number

EXA/9187/2025

Filing Date

21-Mar-2025

Registration No

EXA/1524/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA CAPITAL FINANCE SERVICE LTD)

    Adv. O M Gujar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRINCE TRANS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED RAJESH BAL SINGH AND ANR

  2. 2.RAJESH BAL SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in 150+ consolidated matters involving Tata Capital Limited, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of arbitration law. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 24-Jul-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 24-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 21-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1524/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in 150+ consolidated matters involving Tata Capital Limited, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of arbitration law. Following Supreme Court precedent, the court dismissed all execution and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case