SAMARTH NAGAR LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY URBAND DEPARTMENT Advocate - GP OS, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC — HCBM20091632025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020091632025

Filing Number

WP/9164/2025

Filing Date

21-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMARTH NAGAR LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION

    Adv. D P SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY URBAND DEPARTMENT Advocate - GP OS, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

  2. 2.SAMARTH NAGAR LOKHANDWALA COMPLEX CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETIES ASSOCIATION LTD

    Adv. RMG Law Associates

  3. 3.HEMANT NAIR SECREARY

    Adv. RMG Law Associates

  4. 4.MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  5. 5.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  6. 6.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (BUILDING PROPOSAL)

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  7. 7.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (BUILDING PROPOSAL)

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  8. 8.SAMARTHA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

  9. 9.SWAMI SAMARTH PRASANNA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure procedural defects in their writ petitions and interim applications within four weeks. The court ordered that petitions and applications failing to comply with office objections under O.S. Rule 986 would be rejected for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  9. 15-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  10. 18-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  12. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  14. 22-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  15. 22-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  16. 03-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  17. 03-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  18. 26-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  19. 26-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla

  20. 25-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF

  21. 25-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 21-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure procedural defects in their writ petitions and interim applications within four weeks. The court ordered that petitions and applications failing to comply with office objections under O.S. Rule 986 would be rejected for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case