BHARAT RAO vs SURENDRA SHAH Advocate - Jitendra Jain — ARBAP/121/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020091012026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

ARBAP/9101/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

ARBAP/121/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT RAO

    Adv. Sanket Mungale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURENDRA SHAH Advocate - Jitendra Jain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Swanand R. Ganoo as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Bharat Rao and Surendra Shah arising from a Partnership Deed dated 26 March 2007. Both parties agreed to a single arbitrator structure, and the court directed the arbitrator to submit a statutory disclosure statement within two weeks and the parties to appear for procedural directions on arbitration conduct. Arbitrator fees will be borne equally by both parties, subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBAP/121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Swanand R. Ganoo as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Bharat Rao and Surendra Shah arising from a Partnership Deed dated 26 March 2007. Both parties agreed to a single arbitrator structure, and the court directed the arbitrator to submit a statutory disclosure statement within two weeks and the parties to appear for procedural directions on arbitration conduct. Arbitrator fees will be borne equally by both parties, subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case