SITARAM RAMMURAT YADAV vs ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR WESTERN SUBRB — HCBM20090172025
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020090172025
Filing Number
WP/9018/2025
Filing Date
20-Mar-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Cooperative Societies ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED U/S 986
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SITARAM RAMMURAT YADAV
Adv. Adv Rajesh P Khobragade
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR WESTERN SUBRB
Adv. ,GP OS,GP OS,GP OS,GP OS 1123
-
2.TH DY COLLECTOR (ENC/REM) AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY ANDHERI 1
Adv. GP OS
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
4.OM SAI SHASTRI NAGAR SRA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
-
5.SMGK PVT LTD
-
6.GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
Adv. GP OS
-
7.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Adv. GP OS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple writ petitions (53 WPL cases from 2019-2025) for rejection. The Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections by filing/uploading compliance praecipe within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
20-Mar-2025
Case filed
Summary: The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple writ petitions (53 WPL cases from 2019-2025) for rejection. The Court granted petitioners a final opportunity to cure office objections by filing/uploading compliance praecipe within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts