RANJANA BHARAT JAIN vs MUKESH BHARAT JAIN DECEASED — TP/2581/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020090012026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/9001/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2581/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJANA BHARAT JAIN

    Adv. AKHILESH SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESH BHARAT JAIN DECEASED

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2581/2026 The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 9th June, 2026 and adjourned the matter for further compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules 1980, and verify whether any cross petitions were filed. The matter was given liberty to be relisted after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2581/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2581/2026 The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioner's advocate on 9th June, 2026 and adjourned the matter for further compliance. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notices on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond per Bombay High Court Rules 1980, and verify whether any cross petitions were filed. The matter was given liberty to be relisted after all compliance is completed and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case