Swati Urmil Visaria YASHIKA JAIN vs Late Asha Suresh Dani — TP/2555/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020089892026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8989/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2555/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Swati Urmil Visaria YASHIKA JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Late Asha Suresh Dani

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2555/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of deceased Asha Suresh Dani through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The court will verify if any cross petition exists and allowed the petitioner liberty to relist the matter after completing all compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2555/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2555/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of deceased Asha Suresh Dani through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The court will verify if any cross petition exists and allowed the petitioner liberty to relist the matter after completing all compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case