Swati Urmil Visaria YASHIKA JAIN vs Late Asha Suresh Dani — TP/2555/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020089892026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
TP/8989/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
TP/2555/2026
Registration Date
06-05-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Succession ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swati Urmil Visaria YASHIKA JAIN
Respondent(s)
Late Asha Suresh Dani
Hearing History
Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Case TP/2555/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of deceased Asha Suresh Dani through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The court will verify if any cross petition exists and allowed the petitioner liberty to relist the matter after completing all compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case TP/2555/2026 Summary: The case was called for directions on 9th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of deceased Asha Suresh Dani through the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an Affidavit of Service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, justify surety, and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The court will verify if any cross petition exists and allowed the petitioner liberty to relist the matter after completing all compliance for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts