KULWANT SINGH MOKHA vs GURUCHARAN SINGH MOKHA — IA/3146/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020088622026
Filing Number
IA/8861/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
IA/3146/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULWANT SINGH MOKHA
Adv. Devmani Shukla
Respondent(s)
-
1.GURUCHARAN SINGH MOKHA
-
2.BHUPINDER SINGH KEER
-
3.DAVINDER KAUR MOKHA
-
4.DILMOHAN KAUR CHADHA
-
5.ARVIND KAUR GHURA
-
6.GURVEEN KAUR OBEROI
-
7.7A) JASPAL MOKHA, B) RUPINDER ANAND C) GURPREET KHURANA D) SURINDER BANGA
-
8.Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
Case Summary: IA/3146/2026 - Kulwant Singh Mokha v. Gurucharan Singh Mokha & Others In this execution application before the Bombay High Court, the court adjourned the matter to 15 June 2026 for directions. The case involves disputed charges payable to MIDC (approximately Rs. 1.13 crore) and unauthorized sub-letting charges (approximately Rs. 72 lakhs) relating to two firms operating on the subject plot. The court directed respondents 1-6 to remain present at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/3146/2026
Case Summary: IA/3146/2026 - Kulwant Singh Mokha v. Gurucharan Singh Mokha & Others In this execution application before the Bombay High Court, the court adjourned the matter to 15 June 2026 for directions. The case involves disputed charges payable to MIDC (approximately Rs. 1.13 crore) and unauthorized sub-letting charges (approximately Rs. 72 lakhs) relating to two firms operating on the subject plot. The court directed respondents 1-6 to remain present at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts