UGRO CAPITAL LIMITED vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT PLEADER — WP/1743/2026

Case under The Insolvency and Bankrupcy Code,2016 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020088542026

Filing Number

WP/8853/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/1743/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

Insolvency Bankcruptcy ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Insolvency and Bankrupcy Code,2016 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UGRO CAPITAL LIMITED

    Adv. Tikshta Modi AKHIL MODI AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, THROUGH THE REGISTRAR

  3. 3.PRASAD NAMDEO THORAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of Ugro Capital Limited's Writ Petition (L) No. 8853 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra as infructuous, following the petitioner's counsel's submission that subsequent events rendered the petition moot. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1743/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Ugro Capital Limited's Writ Petition (L) No. 8853 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra as infructuous, following the petitioner's counsel's submission that subsequent events rendered the petition moot. All pending applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case