TATA CAPITAL LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY CENTENNAIL SQUARE vs AVSAR ENTERPRISES REP BY ITS PROP NAYAN GALA (BORROWER) — EXA/1525/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020088002025
Filing Number
EXA/8801/2025
Filing Date
19-Mar-2025
Registration No
EXA/1525/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA CAPITAL LIMITED REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY CENTENNAIL SQUARE
Adv. O M Gujar
Respondent(s)
-
1.AVSAR ENTERPRISES REP BY ITS PROP NAYAN GALA (BORROWER)
-
2.MANOJ T KYASARAM (CO-BORROWER)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Case Summary: EXA/1525/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters involving Tata Capital Limited against Avsar Enterprises and others, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
24-Jul-2025
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1525/2025
Case Summary: EXA/1525/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple consolidated matters involving Tata Capital Limited against Avsar Enterprises and others, finding that the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts