Parul Kailesh Pujary Mulla and Mulla Craigie Blunt and Caroe vs Preeti Natubhai Shah Advocate - D S PATIL, -,-,B. B. PAREKH,Gayatri Munnalal Sharma — MPT/405/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 302. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020087722026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
MPT/8771/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
MPT/405/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
Bench Type
Single
Category
PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parul Kailesh Pujary Mulla and Mulla Craigie Blunt and Caroe
Respondent(s)
-
1.Preeti Natubhai Shah Advocate - D S PATIL, -,-,B. B. PAREKH,Gayatri Munnalal Sharma
-
2.Sudha Natubhai Shah
Adv. D S PATIL,B. B. PAREKH Gayatri Munnalal Sharma
Case History
-
17-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jul-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
Case Summary: MPT/405/2026 In this testamentary dispute concerning the estate of deceased Natwarlal Mohanlal Shah, the Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Nilesh Mody as mediator at the joint request of both parties. The court directed the petitioner and respondents to cooperate with the mediator to schedule meetings and resolve their dispute, with mediation costs to be equally shared. The case was adjourned to July 17, 2026, pending the mediator's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
At 3.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MPT/405/2026
Case Summary: MPT/405/2026 In this testamentary dispute concerning the estate of deceased Natwarlal Mohanlal Shah, the Bombay High Court appointed Mr. Nilesh Mody as mediator at the joint request of both parties. The court directed the petitioner and respondents to cooperate with the mediator to schedule meetings and resolve their dispute, with mediation costs to be equally shared. The case was adjourned to July 17, 2026, pending the mediator's report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts