Chandra Nanik Dadlani PIRANI AND CO. vs Bindu Nanik Dadlani ( Deceased ) — TP/2523/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020087112026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8710/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

TP/2523/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

Chandra Nanik Dadlani PIRANI AND CO.

Respondent(s)

Bindu Nanik Dadlani ( Deceased )

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

08-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

08-06-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case Summary: TP/2523/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and issued directions for procedural compliance: notices must be served on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, an Affidavit of Service must be filed, an Administration Bond furnished, and any cross-petitions verified. The matter stands adjourned with liberty for the advocate to move for final listing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2523/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th June 2026 before the Company/Testamentary Registrar. The court heard the petitioner's advocate and issued directions for procedural compliance: notices must be served on non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff's office, an Affidavit of Service must be filed, an Administration Bond furnished, and any cross-petitions verified. The matter stands adjourned with liberty for the advocate to move for final listing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case