RAVI UMASHANKAR SHARMA Yogini Gada vs MANBHAVTI UMASHANKAR SHARMA — TP/2540/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM020086222026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8621/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

TP/2540/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

RAVI UMASHANKAR SHARMA Yogini Gada

Respondent(s)

MANBHAVTI UMASHANKAR SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

08-06-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

08-06-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case Summary: TP/2540/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Ravi Umashankar Sharma and Yogini Gada against Manbhavti Umashankar Sharma (a testamentary matter). The court directed the advocate to obtain and serve citations on all parties, including non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per procedural rules. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the petitioner to seek listing for final hearing once all compliance requirements are fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2540/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Ravi Umashankar Sharma and Yogini Gada against Manbhavti Umashankar Sharma (a testamentary matter). The court directed the advocate to obtain and serve citations on all parties, including non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per procedural rules. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the petitioner to seek listing for final hearing once all compliance requirements are fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case