RAVI UMASHANKAR SHARMA Yogini Gada vs MANBHAVTI UMASHANKAR SHARMA — TP/2540/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020086222026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8621/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2540/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI UMASHANKAR SHARMA Yogini Gada

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANBHAVTI UMASHANKAR SHARMA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2540/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Ravi Umashankar Sharma and Yogini Gada against Manbhavti Umashankar Sharma (a testamentary matter). The court directed the advocate to obtain and serve citations on all parties, including non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per procedural rules. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the petitioner to seek listing for final hearing once all compliance requirements are fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2540/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard the petition by Ravi Umashankar Sharma and Yogini Gada against Manbhavti Umashankar Sharma (a testamentary matter). The court directed the advocate to obtain and serve citations on all parties, including non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office per procedural rules. The office was instructed to verify if any cross-petition was filed and place it before the court accordingly. The matter was adjourned with liberty for the petitioner to seek listing for final hearing once all compliance requirements are fulfilled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case