RAJESH ISSAR HINDUJA D M HARISH AND COMPANY vs BHOJRAJ LILARAM RAHEJA — TP/2474/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020086152026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

TP/8614/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

TP/2474/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH ISSAR HINDUJA D M HARISH AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHOJRAJ LILARAM RAHEJA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2474/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th May, 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations and notices to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for final listing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2474/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2474/2026 The case was called for directions on 8th May, 2026. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations and notices to the Collector, file an affidavit of service, and effect service upon non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office as per procedural rules. The court also directed verification of any cross-petitions. The matter was adjourned with liberty to move for final listing after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case