GAJANAN GOVINDA DADREKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - GP OS — WP/2003/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020086092026

Filing Number

WP/8608/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/2003/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJANAN GOVINDA DADREKAR

    Adv. Angad Giri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - GP OS

  2. 2.THE RENT ADJUDICATION AND RECOVERY (SPECIAL CELL NO.

  3. 3.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY,

  4. 4.MULUND SALPADEVIPADA SRA CHS LTD.

  5. 5.SIDDHARTH CONSTRUCTION CO.

    Adv. Omkar Kulkarni

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking expeditious decision on a November 26, 2024 application. The court directed Respondent No.4 to file necessary statement within two weeks and Respondent No.2 to decide the application within eight weeks, while considering the petitioner's claim of Rs. 5,00,000 rent arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking expeditious decision on a November 26, 2024 application. The court directed Respondent No.4 to file necessary statement within two weeks and Respondent No.2 to decide the application within eight weeks, while considering the petitioner's claim of Rs. 5,00,000 rent arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case