GAJANAN GOVINDA DADREKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - GP OS — WP/2003/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020086092026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/8608/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2003/2026

Registration Date

22-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

SLUM REDEVELOPEMENT SCHEMES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

GAJANAN GOVINDA DADREKAR

Adv. Angad Giri

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. GOVERNMENT PLEADER Advocate - GP OS

THE RENT ADJUDICATION AND RECOVERY (SPECIAL CELL NO.

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY,

MULUND SALPADEVIPADA SRA CHS LTD.

SIDDHARTH CONSTRUCTION CO.

Adv. Omkar Kulkarni

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

15-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking expeditious decision on a November 26, 2024 application. The court directed Respondent No.4 to file necessary statement within two weeks and Respondent No.2 to decide the application within eight weeks, while considering the petitioner's claim of Rs. 5,00,000 rent arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking expeditious decision on a November 26, 2024 application. The court directed Respondent No.4 to file necessary statement within two weeks and Respondent No.2 to decide the application within eight weeks, while considering the petitioner's claim of Rs. 5,00,000 rent arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case