DAYANAND NILKANT NAIK vs MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER — HCBM20085502025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020085502025

Filing Number

WP/8549/2025

Filing Date

17-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED U/S 986

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAYANAND NILKANT NAIK

    Adv. RAJESH LACHAYYA DHARAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNCIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

  2. 2.THE ASSISATANT COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER

  4. 4.SENIOR INSPECTOR (LICENSE),

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE HEALTH OFFICER

  6. 6.DY. CHIEF FIRE OFFICER

  7. 7.INDIRA RADHAKRISHNA NAIR

    Adv. Milind D Dhande,DIVYA R. TIWARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    This document is a procedural order listing multiple petitions for rejection, not a judgment on the merits of Dayanand Nilkant Naik's case. The Bombay High Court's Prothonotary gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure office objections and file compliance praecipes, with automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance. The substantive dispute between Naik and the Municipal Corporation remained unresolved on this procedural date (May 6, 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 17-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a procedural order listing multiple petitions for rejection, not a judgment on the merits of Dayanand Nilkant Naik's case. The Bombay High Court's Prothonotary gave petitioners a final four-week opportunity to cure office objections and file compliance praecipes, with automatic rejection under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance. The substantive dispute between Naik and the Municipal Corporation remained unresolved on this procedural date (May 6, 2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case