IDBI Bank Limited vs G S Entertainment Private Limited — IA/2177/2026

Case under Transfer of Property Act Section 53. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020085342026

e-Filing Number

08-03-2026

Filing Number

IA/8533/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

IA/2177/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer of Property Act Section 53

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IDBI Bank Limited

    Adv. Ankur Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.G S Entertainment Private Limited

  2. 2.Guneet Singh WaliaAlias Bunty Walia

  3. 3.Jaspreet Walia Alias Jassi Walia

  4. 4.Prithipaul Singh Walia

  5. 5.Arvind Walia

  6. 6.Sohail Khan

  7. 7.Narang Biz Private Limited

  8. 8.Gopal Narang

  9. 9.PVR Pictures Limited

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

    Case S/154/2025 – Directions Order (9th April 2026) The court directed the applicant to remove office objections on Interim Application (L) No. 8533 of 2026 within two weeks by filing compliance praecipe, failing which the application shall be rejected for non-compliance of O.S. Rule 986. The plaintiff's request to substitute Defendant No. 7 company (due to amalgamation) was accepted, and the matter was removed from the board pending the decision on the interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case S/154/2025 – Directions Order (9th April 2026) The court directed the applicant to remove office objections on Interim Application (L) No. 8533 of 2026 within two weeks by filing compliance praecipe, failing which the application shall be rejected for non-compliance of O.S. Rule 986. The plaintiff's request to substitute Defendant No. 7 company (due to amalgamation) was accepted, and the matter was removed from the board pending the decision on the interim application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case