RASHMEE ATUL AMERSEY WIFE OF SHRI ATUL NANALAL AMERSEY BHARTI A SESAI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT — HCBM20084782025
Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED U/S 986 on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020084782025
Filing Number
WP/8477/2025
Filing Date
15-Mar-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED U/S 986
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RASHMEE ATUL AMERSEY WIFE OF SHRI ATUL NANALAL AMERSEY BHARTI A SESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE HOUSING DEPARTMENT
Adv. ,GP OS,GP OS,GP OS 1123
-
2.THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR
Adv. GP OS
-
3.SUB-REGISTRAR OF ASSURANCES MUMBAI - 3
Adv. GP OS
-
4.THE SECRETARY CHAIRMAN RAGHAVJI BUILDING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple consolidated writ petitions (WPL) and interim applications on May 6, 2026. The court granted petitioners and applicants a final opportunity to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the petitions and applications under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
15-Mar-2025
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court issued a procedural order on multiple consolidated writ petitions (WPL) and interim applications on May 6, 2026. The court granted petitioners and applicants a final opportunity to cure office objections by filing compliance praecipes within four weeks; failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of the petitions and applications under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts