SANGLI DISTRICT LABOUR CONTRACT CO OP SOCIETIES CO OP FEDERATION LIMITED SANGLI vs INCOME TAX OFFICER SANGLI — HCBM20084632025

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020084632025

e-Filing Number

14-03-2025

Filing Number

ITXA/8462/2025

Filing Date

15-Mar-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

PENALTIES/PROSECUTION/SETTLEMENT COMMISSION ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANGLI DISTRICT LABOUR CONTRACT CO OP SOCIETIES CO OP FEDERATION LIMITED SANGLI

    Adv. ALISHA PINTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INCOME TAX OFFICER SANGLI

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The High Court of Bombay issued an order on 9th June 2026 rejecting multiple income tax appeals (including those filed by Sangli District Labour Contract Co Op Societies Co Op Federation Limited) for non-compliance with office objections. Appellants were given a final two-week opportunity to cure defects by filing compliance praecipe; failure to do so would result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 15-Mar-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay issued an order on 9th June 2026 rejecting multiple income tax appeals (including those filed by Sangli District Labour Contract Co Op Societies Co Op Federation Limited) for non-compliance with office objections. Appellants were given a final two-week opportunity to cure defects by filing compliance praecipe; failure to do so would result in automatic rejection under O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case